TransPhoto

Fotografiile sunt publicate ca atare și nu au scopul de a promova vreo poziție politică și/sau ideologică.

Toate materialele sunt furnizate de către utilizatorii acestui site și nu reflectă opinia echipei de administrare a ste-ului

Închide
Düsseldorf, Duewag GT8SU Nr. 3229
  Düsseldorf Duewag GT8SU Nr. 3229 
Endstelle S-Bahnhof Gerresheim

Autor: BusUndBahnFan · Neuss           Dată: 29 decembrie 2024 an, Duminică

Afișează locația de fotografiere pe hartă

Statistici

Licență: Copyright ©
Publicat 09.01.2025 09:47 MSK
Vizualizări — 149

Informație detaliată

Düsseldorf, Duewag GT8SU Nr. 3229

Depoul:Rheinbahn AG
Livrat:1983
Model:Duewag GT8SU
Anul construcției:1974
Starea actuală:Transferat în alt oraș (02.2025) Nepregătit pentru serviciu comercial
Funcție:Vehicul de pasageri
Oprit:29.12.2024
Observație:1983 ex Duewag GT8S # 3029. 02.2025 to Kraków, (3229)

Setările camerei foto

Model:iPhone 13
Date and Time:29.12.2024 16:29
Exposure Time:1/50 sec
Aperture Value:1.6
ISO Speed:160
Focal Length:5.1 mm
Arătați datele EXIF

Comentarii · 7

17.02.2025 21:59 MSK
Link
focus1965 · Coast Tram
Fotografii: 8866 · Administrator adjunct / Traducerea interfeței (EN/FR)
I'm pretty sure this is not a regular journey but just an excursion. If this is the case, why is a route number mentionned and later corrected by another route number?
+1
+1 / –0
28.02.2025 17:23 MSK
Link
BusUndBahnFan · Neuss
Fotografii: 31 · Redactor local
Zitat (focus1965, 17.02.2025):
> I'm pretty sure this is not a regular journey but just an excursion. If this is the case, why is a route number mentionned and later corrected by another route number?

You're right it's not a regular ride but a farewell ride. The bar through the line number means that the trip is additional and usually does not drive the entire route. Something like additional rides to an event or the entrance to the depot.
0
+0 / –0
08.03.2025 22:37 MSK
Link
focus1965 · Coast Tram
Fotografii: 8866 · Administrator adjunct / Traducerea interfeței (EN/FR)
The number with a bar is also used in Brussels, for the same reasons.
But. It's not done to mark a route number by a special journey. You must note that it was a farewell ride. Otherwise later someone will use this photo as proof that this type of tram ran in 2025 on route 703/. I had enough troubles in publications with such issues. I remove the route number, you can explain that it was a farewell journey.
0
+0 / –0
04.04.2025 17:04 MSK
Link
BusUndBahnFan · Neuss
Fotografii: 31 · Redactor local
The farewell run was marked as a special train. Signs were re-signed at the photo points for photos. It's clear that none of these vehicles were running on the 703 in 2024; the 703 was discontinued in 2016.
0
+0 / –0
04.04.2025 22:25 MSK
Link
focus1965 · Coast Tram
Fotografii: 8866 · Administrator adjunct / Traducerea interfeței (EN/FR)
On the photo it's marked, but not in the description of it. Worst: in the description route 703/ was marked. Most of the users (me included) have no clue that this route was closed in 2016. A route number can only be indicated when this is a real, regular service. You could always note this in a remark or comment under the photo.
Again: in X years someone will proof with such photos (without explanations) that route 703/ ran 1 time again in 2024 with this material. And this kind of discussions happened. Next time, just mention that it was an excursion, no more, no less. What is clear for you now, is clear for other users and visitors and surely not in x years.
+2
+2 / –0
06.04.2025 20:18 MSK
Link
BusUndBahnFan · Neuss
Fotografii: 31 · Redactor local
If someone claims that in x years, you will recognize the sign in the window as "Farewell GT8SU"
0
+0 / –0
06.04.2025 21:28 MSK
Link
focus1965 · Coast Tram
Fotografii: 8866 · Administrator adjunct / Traducerea interfeței (EN/FR)
Stop arguing.
A new user understood immediately how it must be done, without any explantions.

https://transphoto.org/photo/2057062/

When an explanation is given to you, you have to think about it first. Asking questions about it is always allowed, but you keep making attempts to prove yourself right and that is absolutely not the case here. A route number should never be mentioned if it is not a regular service. I hope I have been clear now.
+1
+1 / –0

Comentariul dumneavoastră

Vă rugăm să nu aduceți în discuție subiecte politice, altfel veți fi suspendat pentru cel puțin o lună!
Trebuie să vă conectați pentru a scrie comentarii.