Transphoto

Les photos sont publiées telles quelles et n'ont pas pour but de promouvoir une quelconque position politique et/ou idéologique.

Tout le matériel est fourni par les utilisateurs et ne reflète pas l'opinion de l'administration du site.

Fermer
Graudenz, Konstal 2N N°. 36
  GraudenzKonstal 2N N°. 36 
Zajezdnia tramwajowa

Auteur: focus1965 · Anvers           Date: Lundi 5 août 2024

Afficher le lieu de prise de vue sur la carte

Statistiques

Licence: Copyright ©
Publiée 21.08.2024 19:23 MSK
Vues — 231

Infos détaillées

Graudenz, Konstal 2N N°. 36

Opérateur/Dépôt:Miejski Zakład Komunikacji sp. z o.o.
Depuis...:1994
Modèle:Konstal 2N
Construit:1992
État actuel:En opération
Service:Spécial
Remarques:1994 ex Bydgoszcz, 450

Paramètres de caméra

Model:Canon EOS 80D
Date and Time:05.08.2024 13:49
Exposure Time:1/250 sec
Aperture Value:9
ISO Speed:160
Focal Length:50 mm
Afficher toutes les balises EXIF

Commentaires · 3

25.08.2024 02:01 MSK
Lien
Tramwajooo · Pabianice
Photos: 638 · Traduction d'interface (PL/EN)
They didn't mind you taking pictures? Because if nothing has changed (I was in Grudziądz 12.07.2024), there are signs with prohibiting photography.
0
+0 / –0
25.08.2024 17:43 MSK
Lien
focus1965 · Anvers
Photos: 8812 · Administrateur Délégué / Traduction d'interface (EN/FR)
Quote (Tramwajooo, 25.08.2024):
> there are signs with prohibiting photography

Indeed, I saw a sign on the administrative building with blinded windows. Of course, I did not photograph that sign.
Otherwise and to my knowledge, I didn't break any law by photographing an old tram depot with an almost equally old tram - from the street and without entering the private grounds.
I can also put such a sign in front of my house. Question is what I can do if someone would take a picture, from that sign or my house...
0
+0 / –0
13.09.2024 10:24 MSK
Lien
Ymtram · East Haven - Branford
Photos: 21913 · Modérateur de photos de sources tiers / Vérificateur de photo / Rédacteur général / Rédacteur de nouvelles / Traduction d'interface (EN)
Generally the Western 'school of law' (and most certainly the English 'school of law') attributes permissiveness of photography with where the photo is taken from, e.g. whether the photographer is standing on a 'free' public ground, or on a private ground where access rights or conditions of conduct can be restricted by that private party. Thus photography permissiveness is not associated with the subject of photography itself. That is, if a photo of a nuclear submarine is taken through a hole in a fence of a military base, while the photographer was standing on public land outside the fence - it is perfectly legal.

Some question such approach, but it is definitely the clearest and most obvious way to sort out legal issues related to photography. For one thing, it is not possible to post the 'no photo' signs on all objects where photos are unwanted. Thus often confusion and misunderstanding exists in the 'East' (pardon my generalization), where photography rights are associated with the subject / object of the photo, when some obscure rules about photography exist, but there is no way the photographer can know about them. You often find out about the rules when the militia or security approach you, and it is already too late :( While in the 'West' the laws are immediately clear through land attribution of the ground the photo was taken from.

And yes, I also remember that strange sign in Grudziądz :)
+1
+1 / –0

Votre commentaire

S'il vous plaît ne discutez pas de sujets politiques ou vous serez banni pour une durée d'un mois !
Vous devez connecter pour écrire des commentaires.