TransPhoto

Photos are published as is and do not have purpose to promote any political and/or ideological position.

All materials are provided by users and do not reflect the opinion of the site administration team.

Close
Zwickau, Tatra KT4DMC № 947; Zwickau, Tatra KT4DMC № 938; Zwickau — Tram-railway system "Zwickauer Modell" • Straßenbahn-Eisenbahnkonzept "Zwickauer Modell"
  ZwickauTatra KT4DMC № 947  —  бағыты 3, 947+938
Tatra KT4DMC № 938  —  бағыты 3, 947+938
Tram-railway system "Zwickauer Modell" • Straßenbahn-Eisenbahnkonzept "Zwickauer Modell"
Haltestelle Zwickau, Zentrum
On weekdays, at the time the photo was taken, a train could be combined with a tram once an hour.

Автор: focus1965 · Antwerpen           Date: 14 тамыз 2021 ж., сенбi

Show shooting location on the map

Statistics

License: Copyright ©
Published 01.09.2021 23:16 MSK
Көріністер — 579

Detailed info

Zwickau, Tatra KT4DMC № 947

Депо / Саябақ:Städtische Verkehrsbetriebe Zwickau
Бастап..:11.2002
Үлгі:Tatra KT4DMC
Салынған:1990
Зауыттық №:179047
Ағымдағы күй:Пайдаланылады
Мақсаты:Жолаушылар
Ескерту:11.2002 ex Tatra KT4DM; 10.1995 ex Tatra KT4D
10.1990 delivered
06.1995 — 10.1995 modernized (model changed to KT4DM)
11.2002 — modernized (model changed to KT4DMC)

Zwickau, Tatra KT4DMC № 938

Депо / Саябақ:Städtische Verkehrsbetriebe Zwickau
Бастап..:2001
Үлгі:Tatra KT4DMC
Салынған:1987
Зауыттық №:177183
Ағымдағы күй:Пайдаланылады
Мақсаты:Жолаушылар
Ескерту:2001 ex Tatra KT4DM; 1995 ex Tatra KT4D
seit 2001 Steuerung TV Progress • с 2001 года управление TV Progress • since 2001 TV Progress control system

Camera Settings

Model:Canon EOS 80D
Date and Time:14.08.2021 18:17
Exposure Time:1/250 sec
Aperture Value:5
ISO Speed:100
Focal Length:25 mm
Show all EXIF tags

Comments · 2

02.09.2021 03:34 MSK
Link
vitaliy80 · Philadelphia
Фотосуреттер жоқ
Второй вагон не AEG GT6M а Tatra KT4DMC
Рахмет! Түсініктеме ескерілді
+1
+1 / –0
02.09.2021 21:25 MSK
Link
focus1965 · Antwerpen
Фото: 8812 · Әкімшінің орынбасары / Сайтты аудару (EN/FR)
Thank you, I have corrected it. The mistake was mine; the correct number is clearly readable on the original image (larger resolution).
+1
+1 / –0

Your comment

Please do not discuss political topics or you will be banned for at least one month!
You need to log in to write comments.