Zwickau, Tatra KT4DMC Br. 947; Zwickau, Tatra KT4DMC Br. 938; Zwickau — Tram-railway system "Zwickauer Modell" • Straßenbahn-Eisenbahnkonzept "Zwickauer Modell" — Photo

Photos are published as is and do not have purpose to promote any political and/or ideological position.

All materials are provided by users and do not reflect the opinion of the site administration team.

Zwickau,	Tatra KT4DMC	Br. 947	— route 3, 947+938
Tatra KT4DMC		Br. 938	— route 3, 947+938

Haltestelle Zwickau, Zentrum

On weekdays, at the time the photo was taken, a train could be combined with a tram once an hour.

Autor: focus1965 ·

Antwerpen Date: 14 Kolovoz 2021 god., Subota

Published 01.09.2021 23:16 MSK
Pregledi — 579

Detailed info

Rating: +22

Prijevoznik/Pogon:	Städtische Verkehrsbetriebe Zwickau
Since...:	11.2002
Model:	Tatra KT4DMC
Proizvedeno:	1990
Serijski broj:	179047
Trenutačno stanje:	U službi
Namjena:	Putničko vozilo
Napomene:	11.2002 ex Tatra KT4DM; 10.1995 ex Tatra KT4D
10.1990 delivered 06.1995 — 10.1995 modernized (model changed to KT4DM) 11.2002 — modernized (model changed to KT4DMC)

Prijevoznik/Pogon:	Städtische Verkehrsbetriebe Zwickau
Since...:	2001
Model:	Tatra KT4DMC
Proizvedeno:	1987
Serijski broj:	177183
Trenutačno stanje:	U službi
Namjena:	Putničko vozilo
Napomene:	2001 ex Tatra KT4DM; 1995 ex Tatra KT4D
seit 2001 Steuerung TV Progress • с 2001 года управление TV Progress • since 2001 TV Progress control system

Make/Manufacturer:	Canon
Model:	Canon EOS 80D
Date and Time:	14.08.2021 18:17
Exposure Time:	1/250 sec
Aperture Value:	5
ISO Speed:	100
Focal Length:	25 mm
Flash:	Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression mode
Metering Mode:	Center Weighted Average
Shooting Mode:	Shutter priority
Show all EXIF tags

02.09.2021 03:34 MSK
Link

vitaliy80 ·

Philadelphia

No photos

Второй вагон не AEG GT6M а Tatra KT4DMC

✔ Thanks! This comment was taken into account

+1 / –0

02.09.2021 21:25 MSK
Link

focus1965 ·

Antwerpen

Photos: 8812 · Zamjenik administratora / Interface Translation (EN/FR)

Thank you, I have corrected it. The mistake was mine; the correct number is clearly readable on the original image (larger resolution).

+1 / –0

Please do not discuss political topics or you will be banned for at least one month!

You need to log in to write comments.