TransPhoto

Фота публікуюцца на сайце як ёсць, без мэты прасоўвання якіх-небудзь палітычных ці ідэалагічных поглядаў.

Матэрыялы дадаюцца карыстальнікамі і не адлюстроўваюць пазіцыю адміністрацыі сайта.

Закрыць
Антвэрпэн, Siemens MGT6-1-1 № 7226
  АнтвэрпэнSiemens MGT6-1-1 № 7226  —  маршрут 8
Ruggeveldlaan
The recently installed fences make photographing the tram almost impossible here.

Аўтар: focus1965 · Береговой трамвай           Дата: 7 лютага 2021 г., нядзеля

Месца здымак на карце

Статыстыка

Ліцэнзія: Copyright ©
Апублікавана 08.02.2021 00:05 MSK
Праглядаў — 461

Падрабязная інфармацыя

Антвэрпэн, Siemens MGT6-1-1 № 7226

Лакацыя:Антверпен
Дэпо / Парк:De Lijn
Мадэль:Siemens MGT6-1-1
Пабудаваны:05.2001
Стан:Працуе
Прызначэнне:Пасажырскі
After an accident, rebuilt in 07/2003 as:

7226 II = 7226 (I) + 7229 (I) BCDE. Only the front of the tram is the original 7226!

EXIF

Модель камеры:Canon EOS 80D
Время съёмки:07.02.2021 15:24
Выдержка:1/250 с
Диафрагменное число:8
Чувствительность ISO:160
Компенсация экспозиции:–1/3 EV
Фокусное расстояние:45 мм
Паказаць цалкам

Каментары · 4

08.02.2021 00:49 MSK
Спасылка
Petr Bystroň · Вільня
Фота: 3821 · Лакалізацыя (CS)
Oh no, why... These fences were not there since this tram line was opened and nobody was injured by a tram until nowadays... I am glad I was there in 2019.)
+2
+2 / –0
08.02.2021 22:39 MSK
Спасылка
focus1965 · Береговой трамвай
Фота: 8895 · Намеснік адміністратара / Лакалізацыя (EN/FR)
Until recently, the path was only used by people walking with dogs, tram enthusiasts and junkies. They were therefore responsible for a number of arson attacks. In 2016, the castle still looked like this, but it has become much worse. https://transphoto.org/photo/1071183/?vid=75063
Eventually, the remnants (rather: a ruin with run-down buildings) were sold.
The new owner has made an impressive job of it, also of the adjoining buildings, the gardens and, of course, the castle itself.
He has placed fences around his domain to keep out dissenters.
The path belongs to the estate and only a gateway is missing.
The fact that he has already had this fence installed may not be a coincidence. The path was used by all possible services that work there, on the trees, the verge, the tracks and the catenary.
Not only the trucks of the staff were parked there, but sometimes also a waste container...
As long as the castle was uninhabited, this was not a problem. Now that there is regular passage, I suspect that the owner wants to keep the city services (and those of the tram) outside his domain, so that he can just pass through.
Anyway, that fence has indeed become annoying and it is totally impossible to walk the short distance to the end point.
+1
+1 / –0
09.02.2021 01:08 MSK
Спасылка
Petr Bystroň · Вільня
Фота: 3821 · Лакалізацыя (CS)
Thank you for you detailed explatination. I would not expect this area will be in a private possession. It is intersitng he had had this fance installed up to the crossroad (the whole path). Personally, I do not want to say it is little bit selfished but more likely it is...
0
+0 / –0
09.02.2021 23:43 MSK
Спасылка
focus1965 · Береговой трамвай
Фота: 8895 · Намеснік адміністратара / Лакалізацыя (EN/FR)
Just take a look: "Show shooting location on the map" and the map (OpenStreetMap). The path leads to house number 444 and nothing else.
It also has no name and is therefore not a street.
Above it you will find another road, which is actually just as narrow, but has been given a name. This road is also a dead end, but it serves several houses (420 --> 438).
Thus, one can more or less deduce that one street is a public road, while the road next to the tram line is private property.
Such a private road may be used as a service road or included in a walking route, but only with the agreement of the owner. Here I suspect that the new owner has little interest in prying eyes...
0
+0 / –0

Ваш каментар

Палітычныя дыскусіі забаронены.
Увайдзіце або зарэгіструйцеся, каб пакідаць каментары.