TransPhoto

Photos are published as is and do not have purpose to promote any political and/or ideological position.

All materials are provided by users and do not reflect the opinion of the site administration team.

Close
Житомир, Tatra KT4SU № 20
  Житомир Tatra KT4SU № 20 
Вулиця Східна
I noted "Michailovgodska Bul" on my photo. Please, correct this.

Автор: focus1965 · Coast Tram           Date: 15 мамыр 1998 ж., жұма

Statistics

Published 17.02.2019 01:07 MSK
Көріністер — 611

Detailed info

Житомир, Tatra KT4SU № 20

Депо / Саябақ:Tramway (since 1961)
Бастап..:≈ 10.1981
Үлгі:Tatra KT4SU
Салынған:08.1981
Зауыттық №:171016
Ағымдағы күй:Есептен шығарылды (18.07.2018)
Мақсаты:Жолаушылар
Кейінге қалдырылды:06.2013
Қайта өңделген:02.2020
06.2013 г. — отставлен от эксплуатации (консервация).
Списание разрешено по решению исполкома Житомирского горсовета № 756 от 18.07.2018

Camera Settings

Model:Canon MG3600 series
Show all EXIF tags

Comments · 4

17.02.2019 13:25 MSK
Link
kostyanchik_punk · Житомир
Фото: 77
Скорее всего МС ул. Восточная, за спиной фотографа поворот на ул. Бориса Тена.
+1
+1 / –0
17.02.2019 20:02 MSK
Link
Фото: 8
"MichailovGRADska" was a previous name of the street. Since 1996 this is Skhidna street

PS. Thank You for a such nice photos. You return me to my childhood :)
0
+0 / –0
17.02.2019 21:56 MSK
Link
focus1965 · Coast Tram
Фото: 8875 · Әкімшінің орынбасары / Сайтты аудару (EN/FR)
The photos will be posted with pleasure, but as I wrote before: when I have time. Probably Zhitomir will be the last city of this season that I can post here extensively.
As for the street names: in 1993 (and also 1998) I walked around with a stylo and paper and wrote down the street names manually. Once in a while (but I don't know if it was the case with Zhitomir) I could get a city plan. Then the question here is whether I had an outdated plan in 1998 with the wrong street name or whether it was still wrongly written in the streets themselves.
Finally: there was a comment about line 5 that was removed and this also applies to the fact that I mentioned it as line number here. Of course I did not fantasize this: I had (in 1993 and maybe also in 1998) a plan where the tram line was listed as line 5. So I absolutely don't know when the line number exactly disappeared. I'm going to take it into account with the pictures I'm going to post afterwards. See below a plan, mentioning line 5:

1991: http://transphoto.ru/photo/469608/?gid=1227
1994: http://transphoto.ru/photo/365905/?gid=1227
0
+0 / –0
18.02.2019 20:47 MSK
Link
Фото: 8
1: Maybe it was really old plan, without new names. Or maybe You guided according to address signes (some of them remained till nowdays)

2: Historically it was a fifth route, and formally it lost the number after closing third route (in 1974). Even in 1979 some trams went on line without route index (f.e. http://transphoto.ru/photo/539873/?gid=3138 )

In some 80s-90s maps it is line #5, in other — without number. Our community also don't know when the line number finally disappeared.
0
+0 / –0

Your comment

Please do not discuss political topics or you will be banned for at least one month!
You need to log in to write comments.